The Feds, Provinces & Territories Must Work Together to effectively Monitor Carrier Safety Fitness

The Feds, Provinces & Territories Must Work Together to effectively Monitor Carrier Safety Fitness

The System in place currently has been broken for a long time, and solutions offered by Industry have yet to be
acted upon.

(the below is an exert of a communication that was sent by the PMTC to the CCMTA, Transport Canada & The
Council of Ministers Responsible for Transportation)

Currently Commercial Motor Carriers who wish to operate a trucking fleet in Canada must apply for a Safety
Fitness Certificate to the Provincial Authority in which they plan to licence their vehicles. If the Provincial Authority
of the base jurisdiction approves the application, a National Safety Code (NSC) will be issued to the Carrier. The
base jurisdiction is then responsible for monitoring the motor carrier for safety and compliance, based on National
Safety Code 14, which is a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) all jurisdictions agreed to several years back.
https://www.ccmta.ca/en/national-safety-code

While in theory this process comes across as seamless and consistent, the reality of how carriers are monitored
from one Canadian provincial jurisdiction to the other vary significantly. For instance, if you were to run a Safety
Fitness Certificate from a carrier based in Ontario and then run one from a carrier in Alberta, it would be almost
impossible to compare the safety rating of the two fleets and decipher which one is the safest of the two.

The substantial differences in how one jurisdiction scores a carriers’ provincial safety rating compared to another,
also leads to chameleon carriers simply closing shop in one jurisdiction and opening in another, exploiting the lack
of communication between jurisdictions and simply open again in a different location. In addition, there are many
carriers in Canada, who exploit the lack of a central reporting system, and the lack of checks and balances in place
between jurisdictions. They start several fleets, register each of them in different jurisdictions with different
National Safety Code Numbers. When they face challenges in one jurisdiction, they simply continue to operate in
the others by transferring vehicles over to the fleet in different jurisdictions so they can continue to operate across
the country despite an undesirable safety profile.

The recent case with Chohan Freight Forwarders in British Columbia illustrates the current problem. The fleet had
its operating authority suspended in British Columbia but had another federally regulated fleet operating out of
Alberta. The absence of a coordinated and centralized system has basically allowed this fleet, deemed unsafe by
one jurisdiction, to continue to operate across the country, including into the province that just suspended their
operating authority. A fleet should only be allowed to have one National Safety Code Number. A central reporting
system would alleviate this type of unsafe practice and ensure a proper tracking system across the country.
https://www.trucknews.com/health-safety/b-c-asks-feds-to-reduce-safety-gaps-following-overpass-crashes/1003181013/

To further showcase how the lack of a centralized and uniformed regulated system may cause alarming road safety
issues, a simple internet search by one of our insurance company members demonstrates the seriousness of the
problem. Back in 2022, it was found that 34 Trucking Companies were listed as operating at the same address in
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, while another 54 companies were found to be listed as operating at one address in
Halifax, Nova Scotia. Most of the emails associated with these companies were the same, from a consultant in
Brampton, Ontario. A quick check at the time showed no trucks were located in either of these locations, despite
records showing 88 trucking companies being registered at these locations. This is just one example of “jurisdiction
shopping” when trucking companies set up their business in a location to save on operating costs, insurance,
oversight, or can easily “relocate” as a result of being shut down in another jurisdiction.

To rectify this issue, we need a national recognized MOU that is more descriptive than what is currently in place
and has some teeth, to create a standardized Carrier Provincial Safety Rating. We must ensure that all the regions across the country monitor and audit carriers following the same consistent criteria with results easily accessible from a central reporting system/one stop shop. Hence, everyone will be able to see and compare a carriers’ safety rating score regardless of the region from which it has been completed and submitted. A seamless access to results
about the carrier’s compliance/non-compliance must be easily accessible to all, including the shippers who could
then verify the safety of the fleet they are hiring.

To achieve this goal, coordinated and harmonized jurisdictional regulations are needed. The current
inconsistencies in regulations and enforcement from one jurisdiction to another reduces efficiency and increase
burdens and cost to the industry. Sadly, it also leads to some carriers who do not have safety and compliance at
the top of their priorities to go jurisdiction shopping to find the one with the least stringent regulations to register
their fleet in.

The Private Motor Truck Council of Canada has been raising this issue at meetings with governments since 2015,
and the most recent case in British Columbia highlights the seriousness of this issue. It needs to be addressed
promptly by regulators, & the PMTC is ready and willing to work together with regulators on this process.

Questions regarding this article please contact :

Mike Millian President

Private Motor Truck Council of Canada

trucks@pmtc.ca

Items to address prior to the January 2023 Federal ELD Enforcement date

Items to address prior to the January 2023 Federal ELD Enforcement date

The Private Motor Truck Council of Canada (PMTC) has worked in collaboration with Transport Canada, (TC) the CCMTA as well as the Provinces & Territories (PT’s) for more than 10 years, to shape an electronic logging device mandate that will improve health and safety for the general public, as well as improve compliance with the regulations, and thus level the playing field and improve conditions for the entire Canadian Trucking Industry. Working together, we learned from the mistakes made in the US, and introduced an independent 3rd party certification process, to ensure ELD’s that are approved, go through a rigorous process to ensure they are compliant with the regulations. 

In March of 2021 CCMTA, TC and the Provinces and Territories all agreed to delay full enforcement of the Federal ELD regulation until June 12th of 2022. This change had to be made, in part, as there were no certified devices that existed at the time. While we all hoped the delay in full enforcement would allow enough time for a fulsome list of devices to be approved, as well as solve other compliance and enforcement related issues, the fact is we still have many items to address. For these reasons, the PMTC was pleased to hear of a further delay in enforcement until January 1, 2023. We believe this was a prudent and responsible decision to allow enough time for issues to be rectified and provide a smoother roll out of full enforcement. 

Saturation of approved devices

As of writing this on March 15th, we have 25 certified ELD’s on the marketplace, from 14 different suppliers. While still more will be needed to provide a good saturation and options for carriers to select from, we believe the extra time provided allows ELD providers with enough time to get their devices submitted for approval in advance of the new date and allow carriers to select from a fulsome list and transition to ensure compliance by January of 2023. The PMTC would not be in favour of any further delays in enforcement as a result of a lack of devices. We believe, with this most recent delay in full enforcement, enough time has now been provided for suppliers & industry.

Items that need addressed prior to January 1, 2023

  • As we understand it currently, a total of 8 Provinces and Territories have regulations in place or will have them in place in time to enforce the federal regulation on January 1st of 2023. As National uniformity in enforcement is important, we believe the remaining jurisdictions need to take the steps necessary to ensure they can enforce the mandate by January 1st as well. While we believe uniformity is important, regardless of the readiness of the remaining jurisdictions, we believe we must move forward with enforcement for those that are ready by January of 2023 with no further delays.
  • To ensure a driver’s Records of Duty Status (RODS) is securely transmitted over the air from the truck to law enforcement, a Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) infrastructure is required. We have learned that TC just recently selected a vendor to develop and implement a system that allows an encrypted ELD Output File transferred securely from truck to the officer, as required by the Technical Standards (TS), to decrypt the message and allow the content to be viewed.  The vendor now must ensure the system is in place in a timely fashion to ensure the system is functional & understood well in advance of the new full enforcement date.
  • We have heard from concerned parties that analyzing RODS at roadside to verify HOS compliance is going to be very challenging.  The ELD Output File is required to provide a driver’s RODS in two standard file formats, PDF and CSV. Currently Canada does not have a method like the United States’ ERODS system for translating the CSV file to a format usable by enforcement.  Therefore, to verify 15 days of RODS, enforcement is currently limited to reviewing the PDF, which can be 50 pages or more in length.  In addition, certain ELD event codes such as Event Record of Origin and Event Record Status, are not explained in words, but remain in code format otherwise found only in the TS.  This means enforcement officers need to understand the meaning of codes wherever such code appears in the PDF. There is a significant concern if RODS verification is too time consuming and difficult to understand, enforcement may simply look at the graph grid on the display and make assumptions regarding a driver’s HOS compliance without looking at event details. We need to ensure these issues are rectified, and significant enforcement training of the items in the TS displayed on the device and in the PDF occurs well in advance of full enforcement taking hold. The main purpose of mandating the use of ELDs is to ensure easier and more accurate verification of HOS compliance leading to a reduction in the instances of operating a commercial motor vehicle while fatigued. We need to ensure the proper tools are in place to ensure this is what occurs. 
  • We need to ensure ELD violations are applied onto a carrier’s Provincial safety rating no matter which jurisdiction they are based out of or charged in. As we understand it, currently no such system is in place with ELD violations to ensure this occurs.
  • Ontario has a robust exemption for Drive-away tow away operators, which are also exempt in the US Federal regulations. Quebec is also indicating they may exempt this. PMTC has learned through discussions with regulators and drive-away tow away operators that it appears the remaining provinces and territories will not exempt this, which will lead to massive confusion and harm to this industry. Can Transport Canada adopt this exemption in the federal regulations, or address it in another manner to ensure we have uniformity across jurisdictions?

The PMTC and its members are appreciative of the common-sense approach to this delay in full enforcement. We know significant pressure existed to move forward with the June 12th enforcement date, however we are in full support of the delay and believe it was the only decision that could be made to ensure a smooth rollout. At the same time, we need to ensure this extra time is not wasted, and work needs to begin immediately to remedy the issues raised above to ensure we have everything in place required to ensure we are prepared for full enforcement well in advance of what we hope is the final delay in enforcement that will be required. 

Mike Millian President
Private Motor Truck Council of Canada

Established in 1977, the Private Motor Truck Council of Canada (PMTC) is the only Canadian association dedicated to the interests of private fleet operators. The PMTC provides forums for fleet operators and industry stakeholders to exchange views and resolve issues together, and is at the forefront in representing your views to government, protecting your rights, and promoting your interests. Want to learn more about the PMTC , visit their website https://www.pmtc.ca/

For information or to register for the PMTC Conference please visit here: https://www.pmtc.ca/content.asp?contentid=182